Oh, Rats!

Dr. Bonnan and three undergraduates at the Richard Stockton College have begun to investigate the forelimb anatomy of the white lab rat (Rattus norvegicus).

This mammal is well-known and has been the center of many studies, but we would now like to take what is known about forelimb locomotion into 3-D by using XROMM technology in cooperation with Brown University.  Currently, three undergraduates are working on different aspects of rat forelimb anatomy, and each will scan and describe the three-dimensional morphology of bones in the rat forelimb.  This summer (2013), XROMM data collected by Dr. Bonnan at Brown will be analyzed in conjunction with the undergraduate students and their long bone scans to reconstruct forelimb movements related to pronation in white rats.  Why are we doing this and what does this have to do with dinosaur locomotion?

Radha Varadharajan
Student Radha Varadharajan dissecting rat forelimbs – she will focus on describing movements of the scapula.
Kadeisha Pinkney
Student Kadeisha Pinkney – she is dissecting rat forelimbs and will be describing the contribution of the humerus to pronation.
Evan Drake
Student Evan Drake – he is dissecting rat forelimbs and will focus on the contribution of the radius and ulna to pronation.

We will begin blogging and tweeting about our lab’s work in the near future … stay tuned!

Dead dinosaurs and reasons for hope

“Time will turn us into statues, eventually.”

– Saint David Grohl, a fighter of foo

As we enter this time of the holidays in the United States, many of us become reflective on the year and take stock of our lives.  For my family and I, this year has been absolutely wonderful, dreadful, fantastic, unnerving, scary, and hopeful.  Why?  There has been a lot of change in our lives: see my lonely post from September for more details and my farewell to my previous institution.  This would also explain my dearth of blog posts, although a weird and interesting topic snuck in this November.

I am also finishing my dinosaur course here at Stockton, and that means I give my final lecture on “What I hope you have learned from dinosaurs.”  It struck me today that this would make an excellent little blog post as well.

One of my grandfathers was fond of asking me, “Why study dinosaurs?  What’s the point?” When you are asked that question enough times, you eventually develop a repertoire of answers.  I don’t know if these ever satisfied him, but I do hope they satisfy those willing to listen:

There are the Big Picture Reasons:

  • First off, dinosaurs are just so damn cool.  Those who need convincing haven’t been paying much attention to the plethora of amazing discoveries that have continued at an ever-accelerating pace since the late 1800s.
  • Dinosaurs put our place in the world into perspective – this is not a world meant for us, but one we have had the happy fortune to inherit from previous generations of life.
  • Dinosaurs were the most successful group of terrestrial vertebrates the world has seen … and they are still among us as beautiful, feathered treasures.  Oh, birds are not dinosaurs?  Like the Honey Badger, the data don’t care … and the support for birds as dinosaurs is as overwhelming as the data for humans as mammals.

And then there are the Practical Reasons:

  • Dinosaurs are the perfect ambassadors for science – they bring scientific concepts and the nature of science to children and the public like nothing else I know.
  • While the doctors and veterinarians of the world are busy saving those people and pets you love, the vertebrate paleontologists are in the trenches at the universities and colleges, teaching the next group of practitioners their anatomy.  That’s right – most vertebrate paleontologists are excellent anatomists.  A certain Larry Witmer comes to mind …
  • Want to understand why vertebrate anatomy is the way it is?  Ask a vertebrate paleontologist – we have to know all that embryology and evolution stuff to inform our research and to blow your mind. =)  The bottom line has always been the anatomy is the result of embryology and evolution … who better to teach that we dinosaur-o-philes?  And so that I’m being fair – all vertebrate paleontologists are this excellent, not just the dinosaur ones!

Yes, you say, but we’ve heard these platitudes before.  You spoke of hope … where is that?  If dinosaurs have taught me nothing else, it is an appreciation for human life.  As successful as dinosaurs were, their Encephalization Quotient (their EQ, or brain size) was never too generous.  We mammals, on the other hand, have had the evolutionary fortune of inheriting a rather different brain with a typically much higher EQ.  To be fair, the birdy dinosaurs around us have enlarged brains compared to their predecessors.

Why is EQ size a reason for hope?  Well, EQ by itself is not, but it is what we Homo sapiens do with it that is.  I am no anthropologist, but speaking in general terms, here are two things one can say about humans that cannot, so far as I know, be applied to other vertebrate animals:

  1. We can both anticipate the future and act on it.
  2. We can use imagination to bring positive things into concrete existence.

For all of their significance and success, the non-avian dinosaurs could not have anticipated their demise, nor could they have done anything to act on it.  Apart from ancient aliens imbuing dinosaurs with a sense of imagination (I can imagine a particular channel of history losing all its credibility), these mighty animals could not have brought forth everything from medicine to concepts of social justice.  As a species, we are certainly still working on a lot and have a long, long way to go, but have you ever stopped to think of how unbelievably special and unique it is that we can act on knowledge and create our future?

So this holiday season, and throughout the year, I hope you may reflect on the fact that whereas for non-avian dinosaurs history’s lessons were inaccessible, they are very much an open book for us.  If we can anticipate what the future will bring, we can act on it.  If we decide to put our imagination to good use, we can create positive change in the world.

The non-avian dinosaurs could not learn from their past, but perhaps we can learn from them … and from our own ancestors.

“So have a toast and down the cup, and drink to bones that turn to dust.” — Oingo Boingo (Danny Elfman’s rock band)

Danny Elfman, creator of the Simpson’s Theme Song, can’t be wrong …

References

Fastovsky, D. and Weishampel, D. 2009. Dinosaurs: A Concise Natural History. Cambridge University Press. 379 pp.

Penis worms, anuses, and evolution

Now that I have your attention, what is a penis worm?  Technically, they are invertebrate animals called priapulids which, if you know your Latin, has the word “penis” in there.  What exactly are they?  They are sausage-shaped, segmented worm-like animals with an extensible, toothy proboscis they use to capture prey.  Here is what a priapulid looks like:

Priapulus caudatus

A priapulus “worm” — the proboscis is pointing up in this picture.

What do these weird-looking and rather unknown animals have to do with evolution?  A whole lot, as it turns out.

The group of creatures we call Animals is incredibly diverse, and most of us have only a passing familiarity with a small fraction of these denizens.  It turns out that once you get past sponges, jellyfish and their kin, and a weird band of animals called comb jellies, there is a great clade of animals called the Bilateria.  Sounds formal, but basically the name means that this group of animals is bilaterally symmetrical – that is, these animals have symmetry about their midline and have right and left sides.  Look in the mirror – congratulations, you, too, are a member of Bilateria!

File:SymmetryOfLifeFormsOnEarth.jpg

The diversity of Bilaterian animals.

You may not appreciate it, but one of the key developments of bilaterian animals is forming a distinct mouth and anus.  This involves the formation of a gut tube, and like all tubes it has to start somewhere.  That somewhere is a puckered indentation called a blastopore that forms early during their embryonic development.  Yes, even we humans develop a blastopore as the beginning of our gut tract.

Among the bilaterian animals, there has traditionally been a split proposed that divides these organisms into two groups based on a fundamental difference in the way their digestive tracts develop.  In one group called Protostomes, the blastopore becomes the mouth, and the gut tract develops until it “punctures” the other end of the animal, forming the anus.  The word Protostome means “mouth first.”  Protostomes include a huge variety of animals such as insects, crustaceans, earthworms, mollusks, and most other “creepy-crawlies” you are familiar with.

In the other group, called Deuterostomes (meaning “mouth second”), the blastopore becomes the anus and the digestive tract stretches from hind to fore, eventually “punching” through the head region to form the mouth.  As I like to tell my students, Deuterstomes develop from the bottom up – you may now groan.  Something that may make you groan all the more is the fact that we vertebrates are members of the Deuterostomes.

File:Protovsdeuterostomes.svg

The development of the mouth and anus in Protostomes and Deuterostomes.

What does all this have to do with Priapulids?  Everything.  You see, the big evolutionary question is which came first, Protostome development or Deuterostome development?  Which is the original condition in the common ancestor?  Knowing this would inform our understanding of how other changes in development downstream from this evolutionary event were effected, and what we should predict to see in various animal lineages.

So, in a recent study by Martin-Duran and colleagues (2012) in which they followed the development of this engimatic worm, they found … drum roll … that priapulids develop as Deuterostomes, with the blastopore forming the anus.  Why is this shocking?  Because: priapulids share all the major DNA and anatomical characteristics with those of Protostomes!  In fact, they are nested among the members of the Ecdysozoa, the exoskeleton-bearing animals that include insects, nematodes, and crustaceans.  All of those animals have protostomic development … why would priapulids be any different in this regard?

Martin-Duran and colleagues (2012) suggest that we have it wrong when it comes to these evolutionary divisions of animals.  It turns out that we may be too hung up on what the blastopore forms.  Instead, Martin-Duran et al. (2012) suggest that it is the separation of the mouth from the anus that is the major adaptation to focus on in Bilaterian animals.  Given that a number of Protostome animals are similar to priapulids in having all the protostome characteristics except that their blastopore forms the anus, it seems that the Deuterostome condition was the most primitive.  In other words, the Protostome condition is derived, and probably developed independently several times.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/cache/MiamiImageURL/1-s2.0-S0960982212011396-fx1_lrg.jpg/0?wchp=dGLbVlt-zSkzV

Figure 4 from Martin-Duran et al. (2012) showing their evolutionary hypothesis for Bilaterian animal development.

What does all this mean?  It means that we now need to re-explore animal relationships and the fossil record to re-test whether the way we understand the evolution of the major animal groups is in need of re-tooling.  Who would have thought that a penis worm and the origin of its anus would have such an evolutionary significance?

References

  • Freeman, S. 2011. Biological Science, 4th Edition. Pearson.
  • Martin-Duran, J.M., Janssen, R., Wennberg, S., Budd, G.E., and Henjol, A. 2012. Deuterostomic development in the Protostome Priapulus caudatus. Current Biology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.037